Jersey City $4.6 Billion Casino Resort Proposed for North Jersey - Manassehs Children
single,single-post,postid-4999,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-theme-ver-5.7,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-4.3.4,vc_responsive

Jersey City $4.6 Billion Casino Resort Proposed for North Jersey

02 Mar Jersey City $4.6 Billion Casino Resort Proposed for North Jersey

A casino in Jersey City could fight off competition from New York in the Garden State casino market (Image:

Venture capitalist Paul Fireman wants to build a $4.6 billion casino resort in Jersey City, according to reports by the newest Jersey press. State Governor Chris Christie recently declared his openness to your expansion of casino video gaming into North Jersey, also it appears Fireman, who is a former ceo of reebok and today operates Fireman Capital Partners, is working hard to make it happen.

The businessman has been ending up in New Jersey politicians over the month that is past discuss their proposal for the 95-story hotel and casino rising above New York Harbor that would additionally feature a motorsports stadium and ‘the largest Ferris wheel in the world.’

Atlantic City, that has always had the monopoly on casino gaming since the property that is first there in 1978, has lately been in dire economic straits. Despite injections of money and a plan that is five-year rejuvenate the town, spearheaded by Governor Christie in 2011, its casino market didn’t bounce back from the recession, because was hoped.

Also, it is often hit hard by new competition from neighboring states such as for example Pennsylvania, which has superseded brand New Jersey as the 2nd casino market that is biggest in the united states, after Nevada. And even though Atlantic City casinos like The Showboat and Revel contemplate closure, Christie has apparently been forced to concede that a tactic that is new needed.

Very good News for AC?

But far from hurting Atlantic City, many analysts believe an expansion in the north will help the ailing resort. The proposed resort in Jersey would stay right across the harbor from Manhattan, and would work as a bastion, protecting brand New Jersey from further competition from the new casinos prepared for upstate New York, diverting New Yorkers and vacationers away from those gambling enterprises, while gathering revenue that may assist develop Atlantic City.

State Senate President Stephen Sweeney agrees.

‘This conversation is going to be had because it has become had, however it won’t be had at Atlantic City’s expense,’ he said. ‘If anyone believes that I’m not committed to Atlantic City, they’re crazy. We cannot ignore that competition will be in nyc shortly. But if New Jersey responds by opening a casino in North Jersey, it should take place in ways that may truly benefit Atlantic City. Right now we tax casinos at eight-and-a-half %. Maybe we set a new tax rate for a casino in the north and a portion of that that’s significant enough to help Atlantic City comes to Atlantic City.’

‘It Will Blow Away Macau’

While casino expansion into North Jersey would require an amendment to your state constitution, Sweeney said recently he had been prepared to allow citizens to vote on this kind of amendment year that is next. And while information on the proposed development in Jersey City remain few and far between, it appears that Fireman has convinced some people in high places already.

Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop indicated his excitement this week about a ‘world-class facility which includes a casino, resort and meeting center as well as the largest Ferris wheel on the planet all found next to the best park in nj-new jersey (Liberty State Park).’ He added that the project would ‘create 25,000 jobs’ and attract ‘over $5 billion of investment.’

‘It’s huge,’ said state Senator Raymond Lesniak, who has met with Fireman. ‘It has the wow factor … it’s going to blow away Macau as being a destination place for gaming.’

Casinos Seek Conscious Uncoupling from US Dog Rushing

Greyhound dog racing is now simply a sideshow at many US tracks, where casino games bring within the profits that are real. The sport in addition has been the main topic of intense criticism. (Image:

In the event that you look around america, you’ll still see a fair amount of dog race, at least in those states that haven’t made the practice illegal, following massive critique of several of this problems surrounding the sport. But at most songs, greyhounds are now raced and then fulfill an obligation that is legal allows the owners to also stage more profitable activities. And in case the time comes when that motivation to stage dog races goes away, there could be no reason left to own them at all: one thing that many people would say is a good thing.

The signs of dog racing’s demise were seen by industry experts for decades. In 1990, there was nearly $1 billion bet on live dog races in Florida, one of the hotbeds that are remaining the contests. In 2013, that number had dropped to $258 million. The decline happens to be largely caused by the spread of casino gambling across the nation, which gave gamblers and tourists more options for spending their time and money.

Dog Racing Only a Path to Casino Revenues

Yet those same casinos have likely saved greyhound racing at the same time. Many tracks are subsidized by the casinos that are same have actually taken their business away, making it profitable to help keep the races going, even as interest in them has waned.

Most of the time, the track owners actually run casinos, slot parlors, or poker spaces themselves. In these situations, it’s almost always one other business that is lucrative; the races are needed as section of licenses that need ‘coupling’ the casino-style games with races.

That’s the situation in Florida, that will be still home to 12 of the 21 American tracks that offer live racing that is greyhound. A number of other tracks don’t have their own races anymore, and keep up the part that is racing of bargain only by simulcasting competitions off their tracks.

Owners, Opponents Want Decoupling

It has left racetrack that is many to push for a ‘decoupling’ movement that would end their obligation to operate dog events and just allow them to focus on the other gambling passions. This has triggered an alliance that is unusual track owners and animal rights teams who believe that the races are cruel and that the dogs are mistreated. These teams think that decoupling will inevitably induce the end (however slowly) of greyhound racing in america.

In Florida’s newest try to restructure the state’s gaming laws, one proposal to decouple casino gambling from greyhound racing was rejected, though it may come year that is back next. Similarly, West Virginia killed a bill that would have cut the certification fees and reduced the number that is minimum of days needed at certainly one of the state’s two dog racing tracks.

With both owners and opponents up to speed for decoupling, you may be wondering who is against the change. One answer is the horse racing industry, which believes this kind of movement could sooner or later kill their sport also.

Horse racing is a far more popular and financially viable sport than greyhound racing. However, only the largest tracks are truly lucrative, and numerous now operate ‘racinos’ with slot machines along with other games in order to turn a profit. If horse racing are not needed, some of these tracks could switch up to casino that is pure, shrinking the industry.

Greyhound racing is currently illegal in 39 states, while four others have no tracks, despite the lack of regulations prohibiting them. Each host one or two dog racing tracks along with Florida, which has a dozen venues, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Iowa, Texas and West Virginia.

As Portuguese Economy Tumbles, RGA Chides Online Tax Hikes

The Remote Gambling Association has reacted to new Portuguese online sports betting operator taxes, even as Portugual continues to face overall economy. (Image:

Even as Portuguese banking shares tumbled this week, sending fear throughout the EU bank operating system, the Remote Gambling Association (RGA), the largest Web gaming trade association on earth, has slammed Portugal’s draft gambling bill, branding its tax rates as ‘unworkable’ and urged regulators to believe once more. The punitive 8 to 16 % tax on activities stakes that are betting make the market ‘unviable’ for online operators, it says.

The bill is currently winging its way through the Portuguese parliamentary system, with the us government anxious to regulate at the earliest opportunity as part of a wide-ranging recovery plan that is economic. Portugal once was bailed away from a financial meltdown in 2011 by the EU Commission, the European Central Bank and Overseas Monetary Fund in a €78 billion ($106.14 billion) rescue system. It exited the system in might and now faces increasing pressure to bolster its still-embattled economy.

Secretary of State Adolfo Mesquita Nunes announced recently that income tax revenues through the new online gambling market will be split between central and regional governments and used to ‘encourage sport and for cultural development.’ Along with the tax on stakes, gross revenue on sports wagering will be taxed at around 37.5 percent, while ‘games of chance,’ which include casino gaming, and, apparently, poker, will be somewhere between the 15 to 30 percent mark.

‘To the Detriment of users and State’

The RGA claims that current taxation amounts will limit competition into the market ‘to the detriment of Portuguese consumers and also the tax revenues that the Portuguese state could take were the market to be taxed at a sensible rate of gross video gaming revenue.’ It criticized the very fact that the Portuguese monopoly operator of offline sports betting, Santa Casa, is going to be just taxed at half the rate of its online counterparts.

Clive Hawkswood, chief executive officer of this RGA, said: ‘Whilst the RGA and its particular people welcome the Portuguese initiative in wanting to regulate the web gambling sector, our people are extremely concerned about the unworkable tax rates that are proposed in the draft law which will be presently being considered.

‘The extent regarding the disparity in income tax burden between licensed sports that are online operators and also the offline monopoly operator Santa Casa might be just as much as 50 % in support of Santa Casa. Such a differential gets the potential to create a scenario of significant illegal state help being awarded to Santa Casa by the Portuguese government whilst additionally destroying any hope for fair competition in a future regulated online sports betting government.’

Constructive Dialogue Needed

The current draft gambling bill recommends a jurisdiction similar to those that exist in countries like France and Italy while some lawmakers in Portugal wanted to see the introduction of an open market. International operators is able apply for licenses providing they ‘meet the requirements,’ and ‘are in good financial standing within their finances and social security.’ However, companies will also need to be ‘established and registered’ within the nation and can have to give you their services by way of a domain name that is bot.PT.

Mesquita Nunes refused become drawn recently on any projections of annual revenue for the new market, saying that it is impossible to understand how many operators would apply for Portuguese licenses. Aided by the present proposed taxation figures, argues the RGA, the answer to that might be ‘not many.’

The RGA says it would welcome the opportunity to engage in a ‘constructive discussion using the Portuguese government to ensure a playing that is level for several online recreations wagering operators seeking to obtain licenses.’

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.